Anyone who has seen my home knows that I have a bit of a… hmm… obsession with orchids. To control my orchid intake, I meter my purchases to buying more plants only after I have either mastered or killed my latest orchid purchase. This has resulted in nearly 20 pots of these gorgeous plants with orchid “spa treatment days” (i.e., deep watering days) lasting hours at a time. So you can probably imagine the enthusiasm with which I embraced a recent article from the journal Science, in which Harvard researchers Wim L Noorduin and colleagues proclaim that they have discovered how to create predictable complex nano- and microstructures via biomineralization techniques, and then demonstrate this by creating micro-flowers!
Self-assembly of complex forms occur regularly in nature as a result of dynamic interactions with the surrounding environment. Many of these structures have a stunning beauty to them, with snowflakes being one of the most well-known examples of this phenomenon. The claim that no two snowflakes are alike is based on the understanding that the basic shape of a snowflake is guided by a combination of atmospheric temperature and humidity. However, its individuality is “crafted” as it falls through the atmosphere, tracing unique paths and being exposed to different air patterns as its shape shifts with each tumble, spin, pitch and glide, and twirl.
Another, perhaps lesser-known example is the shells of diatoms, a type of algae that is characterized as being encased in a shell formed of silica. These silica shells often exhibit a remarkable level of complexity, being extremely porous to permit gas and nutrient exchange with the surrounding environment.
What makes them of particular interest to physicists and materials scientists is their ability to repeatedly produce these intricate and complex shells through self-assembly with such accuracy that the identification and classification of these creatures can be guided by the patterns and placements of their pores.
Until recently, the study of how these patterns emerge has focused on looking at the chemical compositions and material properties of complex microsystems, or has worked on defining the initial conditions required to generate these forms. While the understanding that complex structures are usually created as a result of dynamic interactions with the surrounding environment is well-accepted, how these complex structures form through self-assembly had never yet reached the point of being something scientists could predict.
So Noorduin and co-authors set off undaunted to discover how dynamic environmental interactions can be used to generate predictable, patterned precipitation in synthetic systems, to create self-assembled complex structures… repeatedly (i.e., in a predictable manner).
It turns out that the secret to growing complex structures is to subject the solution to a dynamically-changing environment, one that responds to its growing shape. The images to the left are scanning electron micrographs that have been artificially colored, but aren’t they beautiful?
It’s important to realize that while Noorduin and colleagues did produce these flowers as a beautiful demonstration of their technique, that all of this isn’t purely just for fun and games. Rather, if we can harness the basic principles guiding self-assembly, especially that of biomineralization, this will change the face of how nano- and micromaterials are made.
As of now, our go-to method for creating nanomaterials is by using lithography techniques, through which 3D structures are laboriously etched. Not only is this slow, it is also very, very expensive. Using the methods this group is developing, it will soon become possible to mass-manufacture complex materials for drug delivery, development of catalysts for chemical production, micro-circuitry, etc., by mechanisms of self-assembly.
The possibilities are truly… endless.
- Pictures: Nano “Flowers” Created in Lab (news.nationalgeographic.com)
- Harvard Researches Grow a Garden of Nanoscience Flowers (boston.com)
- Microscopic crystal ‘flowers’ build themselves in a Harvard lab (science.nbcnews.com)
OK, so I just stole the title of this post from NSF”s first episode of a series they produced in collaboration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and NBC Learn, to explore innovations… and their innovators, around the US. In a fantastic collection of eleven videos, they cover everything from prosthetic exoskeletons (bionic limbs) and 3-D printing, through smart materials, security, and automation. Ready to learn how these innovators came up with their inventions? Are you ready to be inspired? If so, check out the videos here.
I have just returned from a truly stimulating conference co-sponsored by RISD (Rhode Island School of Design) and NSF (National Science Foundation). The conference was entitled, “Bridging STEM to STEAM: Developing New Frameworks for Art/Science Pedagogy.” Attendees included everyone from artists and designers as far-flung as Japan, policy-makers and program officers from NSF, National Endowment of the Arts, and AAAS, accomplished academicians/designers from Brown, RISD, MIT… and then there was me… mesmerized, overwhelmed, and thrilled.
I realize this is not truly a direct discussion of biomimetics or bioinspiration, for that matter, but it is directly related. STEAM is simply a reimagining of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) with Art added in, to signify a new initiative to push for direct collaboration and synergy of the STEM fields with the arts. It also creates a clever, catchy, new acronym. My concern is with the question of whether we, as professionals, academics, students, ready for this collaboration, or are we looking instead at the generation of exactly what the new name suggests: hot air? And if we are ready, what can we do to maximize the success of this wonderful collaboration?
My personal hope is that the combination of art with the sciences will inspire and catalyze progress in both fields. To me, the contribution that art/design can make to the sciences is limitless (and thus a motivation for this blog). In the most obvious connection, art can help with maximizing the visualization and communication of our science. In fact, ask Edward Tufte, and he will probably tell you that the best scientists also have an impeccable design flair combining aesthetics with efficient information communication. See, also, the Nature Methods Points of View column by the Broad Institute’s Bang Wong, for monthly commentary demonstrating how basic design principles facilitate data accessibility. I think all us scientists have a lot to learn from our artist counterparts.
A more challenging aspect justifying combining arts with the sciences is in identifying how art can actually accelerate scientific progress. An excellent example of this is the use of animation software such as Maya for pushing forward X-ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) development, an increasingly valuable tool for biomechanical analyses. Art can also inspire new science, as shown in the PBS documentary “Between the Folds“, in which the ancient art of origami is inspiring mathematics, engineering, and product design.
I leave the challenge of identifying how science can help the arts, to the artists, who can speak more directly about why they would want us in their world… and not for the lack of having ideas about how we can help (think prosthetics and ergonomics, for starters!).
The challenge of the STEM to STEAM conference was to discuss how we can increase the collaborations, to identify the similarities and differences among artists and scientists, and to devise strategies on how to go about bridging the gap… priming the machine, so to speak, for a rather revolutionary change in the way we all think about and do our work.
If you are out there reading this, please weigh in. I would love to hear your thoughts about this matter.
And I now leave you with a video of a project co-produced by one of the conference attendees, Jonathan Harris, called, “I Want You To Want Me.” He is only 30 years old, and already very clearly quite a force to contend with.
I was rummaging through my electronic library today and came across a paper had I read over and over again in 1999 as a new graduate student with a nearly insatiable appetite. I am now realizing that it was right around the time this paper was published, that the seed of biomimetics was planted in my head. This article is written by a then faculty member at UC Berkeley (now at Cal Tech), by the name of Michael Dickinson. Even then, as a fairly new professor, it was clear that Dickinson was a rapidly rising star — one with amazing vision and a force to contend with. As the head of a fly neurobiology and flight lab, he was a pioneer in understanding the mechanisms of fly flight using self-created contraptions such as RoboFly and Fly-O-Rama, pictured above. I hope you enjoy and are inspired by this article as much as I was.
On the hillside of the Fafe Mountains in Portugal stands A Casa do Penedo, or “the House of Stone”. This amazing home is constructed among four large boulders with walls made of a concrete mix, created to melt the actual house into the flanking boulders. The windows overlook the mountains of Marão.
Although the home is built to blend into its natural surroundings, it still has the basic characteristics of a traditional home, with windows, doors, and a shingled roof, as well as creature comforts such as a fireplace and swimming pool, carved out of the side of a boulder.
Apparently, the home was built in 1974 as a family retreat. However, with the overwhelming interest it has attracted due to its unusual design, the current owner, Vitor Rodrigues, has had to move to seek greater privacy. Also, as a result of problems with frequent break-ins, the home is now reinforced with bullet-proof windows, steel doors, and window grates. However, it apparently still contains a rather cozy interior, as shown by this video.
I’ve got this great undergraduate student in my lab who is (at least for now) exhibiting all the traits of the ideal student any professor would love to have around: he volunteers ~10+ hours per week here, if no one is around, he finds things to do to teach himself new skills, he reads journal articles on his own accord that are aligned with interests of the lab, AND he’s creative! Lately, he has been trying to tackle a rather substantial challenge I presented to the lab: designing a force plate that can measure forces under granular media.
OK. Here’s the context: I used force plates to measure how hard and in which directions an animal is pushing when it steps on the ground. By combining this with measured movements of the animal that I quantify by analyzing synchronized high-speed video, I can calculate how much power the muscles must produce around each joint in order for the animal to move the way it does. This technology has been commonly used since the mid-1980s or earlier, for locomotion on flat, homogeneously hard surfaces. While we know a lot about how animals move across these types of “lab environment” surfaces, we know far less about movement over natural surfaces that may shift or change squishiness, orientation, etc. with each step.
Granular media, such as sand, therefore, is a particularly interesting material to me, as it actually makes state changes as an animal moves. For example, when sand is sitting undisturbed, it resembles a solid. Yet, when an animal strikes the surface and strokes through it with its foot, the sand actually becomes a fluid for a short while. Any sand that is kicked up during the step is actually acting like a gas! With all this in mind, measuring forces on sand can be a rather challenging conundrum.
In a meeting with my undergraduate student last week, he presented a design to me that involved peppering a surface with a grid of lumps that each could sense fluid movement. Little did he know, what he was showing me was something holding remarkable resemblance to hair cells, sensory receptors that are found in our ears AND in the lateral line system of fishes!
Ever wonder how a school of hundreds of fish manages to… school with such regularity and neat, synchronized prowess? The next time you catch that rainbow trout, sunfish, sailfish, or whatever strikes your fancy, take a close look at the side of their body and you’ll see a series of dashes and dots that run from the rear side of the gill margin all the down to the base of the tail. These little holes mark the external opening to the lateral line, the pressure-sensing secret for fishes.
Within these pores are receptors called neuromasts. Neuromasts look a little like a thimble placed open side down on a table top. Each neuromast is made up of a group of cells called hair cells, named because they (grossly) resemble a Leprocaun troll doll, with different length hair bundles mounted on top.
The entire neuromast is covered in a gelatinous glob, forming a cupula. Deflection of these hair bundles due to changes in fluid flow causes the production of a receptor potential. Deflection direction also stimulates the production of different types and magnitudes of potentials, enabling the fish to determine the direction of the flow. Changes in fluid flow direction or pressure can be due to an underwater obstacle, a neighboring fish, or even a predator, enabling a fish to respond seemingly magically while the approaching object is still far away.
It turns out that my student (I guess not so surprisingly) was not the first person to think of using the neuromast as a biomimetic sensor: a group of scientists at the University of Illinois, Northwestern University, and Institut fur Zoologie have developed nano hair cells they call ALL (for artificial lateral line) that can localize the position of a crayfish placed in a tank. Take a look at their paper, published recently in Bioinspiration and Biomimetics. Call it bias or whatever you want, I am still excited to see where (if anywhere) my student will take this biomimetic idea of his. Let me know if you have any input on how he can potentially use this to invent a new type of force plate technology, and I’ll put you in touch with my student to try to make this a reality!
OK, so I know that some of you are a bit irked by Janine Benyus because her idealism is sometimes a bit too much (e.g., contrary to Benyus, nature really does generate waste, it is not in reality completely waste-free!). However, this TED talk still has a beautiful message that I wanted to share with you all.